By Brian Liu
In what is
likely to become a hallmark case in the line of prayer in government
settings—and on a larger scale, public prayers in its entirety—the case of Town of Greece v. Galloway will be brought before the Supreme Court on November 6th,
after the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to overturn a previous
ruling in favor of the town of Greece.
This case comes from a complaint filed
by Ms. Susan Galloway and Ms. Linda Stephens, both residents of the town of
Greece (in upstate New York), who raised concern over the religious nature of
the monthly town meetings. They argue, given the overwhelming number of
Christian speakers who opened the town meetings with a prayer, and given that
these prayers tended to be denominational in nature (using, for example,
“Jesus” or “Holy Spirit” rather than an all-encompassing “God”), that the
town’s practice is in violation of the Establishment Clause of the
Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion.”
At the core of this case is to what
extent church and state should be separate and whether the presence of
religious speakers in these bodies is, in itself, contrary to that central
principle in our American way of governance.
Opening of proceedings with prayer is
an inextricably historical practice, dating back to the very first days of
Congress. Still to this day, both houses of Congress have their own paid
chaplains on duty, who open all sessions with a prayer. And certainly, many
state and local legislatures carry on the same practice, to varying degrees of
religious exhortation. It would be insurmountably difficult to remove the
practice of opening prayers in its entirety; this case should not be seen as an
attempt at such.
Rather, the arguments on Wednesday will
be centered upon whether or not the presence of a unitarily Christian group of
speakers, as in the case of Greece’s town meetings prior to 2008, is a
subversive promotion of Christian beliefs. In asking the audience of these
proceedings to rise and pray to a specific Christian figure, does this exceed
any pretense of general divine guidance, and become a form of proselytizing for
the Christian faith? Is it tantamount to
a state/public endorsement of a single religion? Is this an unconstitutional
establishment of religion?
The lawyers on the Greece side will
argue that the city council had no hand in selecting the opening speakers. They
will argue that a separate body chose these speakers, and that they never
intended for them to speak specifically in a Christian rhetoric. And they will
argue that these were all volunteer speakers, and as such, there was no
official “endorsement” as in the case of Marsh
v. Chambers, the direct precedent to this case.
It is an enormous challenge that lies
before Ms. Galloway and Ms. Stephens. Facing a town that is overwhelmingly
Christian, and opposition that counts a number of congressmen, state
representatives, theologians, and even the Obama administration in their ranks,
their argument must be—above all—infallible. There is, as always, no predicting
what course of action the Court will take, but as it seems thus far, Greece has
far and away the upper hand.
Bibliography
Mehta, Hermant. "Everything You Need to Know About Town
of Greece v. Galloway, the Supreme Court Case About Government Prayer." Patheos.
Patheos.com, 16 Aug. 2013. Web. 05 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/08/16/everything-you-need-to-know-about-town-of-greece-v-galloway-the-supreme-court-case-about-government-prayer/>.
Barsky, Lena. "Public Prayer Comes Back to the
Court." Brown Political Review RSS. Political Theory Project, 30
Oct. 2013. Web. 05 Nov. 2013. <http://www.brownpoliticalreview.org/2013/10/public-prayer-comes-back-to-the-court/>.
Denniston, Lyle. "Argument Preview: Prayer’s Role in
Government." SCOTUSblog RSS. Bloomberg Law, 3 Nov. 2013. Web. 05
Nov. 2013. <http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/11/argument-preview-the-function-of-prayer/>.
"Greece, New York." (NY 14626) Profile:
Population, Maps, Real Estate, Averages, Homes, Statistics, Relocation, Travel,
Jobs, Hospitals, Schools, Crime, Moving, Houses, News. City-data.com, n.d.
Web. 05 Nov. 2013. <http://www.city-data.com/city/Greece-New-York.html>.
Klukowski, Ken. "Symposium: Time to Restore
Longstanding Meaning – and Sanity – to the Establishment Clause in Town of
Greece v. Galloway." SCOTUSblog RSS. Bloomberg Law, 3 Oct. 2013.
Web. 05 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/10/symposium-time-to-restore-longstanding-meaning-and-sanity-to-the-establishment-clause-in-town-of-greece-v-galloway/>.
United States of America. Department of Justice. Office of
the Solicitor General. By Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES
AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONER, n.d. Web.
<http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs-v2/12-696_pet_amcu_usa.authcheckdam.pdf>.
No comments:
Post a Comment