Monday 16 March 2015

Prosecuting Rape in Armed Conflict

By Nina Jones

With the introduction of Common Article 3 in 1949, crimes against humanity in non-international conflict became illegal under international law and were therefore under the jurisdiction of international courts. However, sexual violence, specifically rape, was not included as a crime against humanity though it was acknowledged that even during World War II, all sides of the conflict participated in forcible sexual violence. In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) set a precedent by convicting someone for rape under a crime against humanity charge. This marked the first time rape was a convictable offense in wartime rather than being considered a spoil of war to which victors were entitled.

The Fourth Geneva Convention, adopted in 1949, introduced common Article 3, which applies to armed conflicts that are not international and that take place in one country. Conflicts that are subject to Article 3 include civil wars, internal armed conflicts that involve other states, or conflicts that garner international support. Article 3 requires that any individual not participating in the conflict, including those considered hors de combat due to injury or other reasons is treated humanely and that those wounded in battle be properly cared for. Additionally, it prohibits a variety of inhumane acts such as torture, hostage taking, and failure to provide a trial before passing sentencing.[1] Additional Protocol II was introduced in 1977 and aims to offer further protections for victims of non-international armed conflict. It works to clarify some of the ambiguities in Article 3 and to ensure the sovereignty of states who might be experiencing internal conflict. Protocol II states that,

Nothing in this Protocol shall be invoked as a justification for intervening, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the armed conflict or in the internal or external affairs of the High Contracting Party in the territory of which that conflict occurs.[2]

The international community’s dedication to national sovereignty also presents the issue of prosecution for crimes against civilians and hors de combat in violation of Article 3 and Protocol II. As it is a treaty and is not ratified or recognized by all nations, it is important to note how it is that international criminal cases can be brought against violators. In The Republic of Nicaragua v. The United States, the International Court of Justice ruled, among other decisions regarding sovereignty, that the U.S. had to comply with the decision even though it objected to the proceedings. This, to many legal scholars, indicates that states or parties being prosecuted had to comply, for “if a state could only be sued when it wanted to be, a state would never be sued.”[3]

Rape is one of the more overlooked and under talked about human rights violations in conflict. For many centuries, rape was considered an inevitable outcome of war.  Historically, armies considered the ability to rape women on the opposing side of conflict a legitimate spoil of war.[4] Even after World War II, neither of the courts set up in Nuremburg and Tokyo recognized sexual violence as a war crime.  The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1992 included rape as a crime against humanity after sexual violence came to the attention of the United Nations Security Council with the widespread rapes of women in the former Yugoslavia.[5] In addition to prosecuting rape as a crime, the ICTY also included sexual slavery in the definition of slavery as a prosecutable crime against humanity.

            In 2008 the United Nations passed UN Resolution 1820, which formally described the act of rape as a “tactic of war and a threat to international security.”[6] The Resolution underscores the importance of acknowledging rape as a legitimate threat and crime in conflict, both internal and international. 

During the Rwandan Genocide, between 250,000 and 500,000 women and girls were raped over three months. Prosecutors Sara Darehshori and Pierre-Richard Prosper used this information to argue that the act of rape was just as integral to the genocide as the killing itself and worked to have rape prosecuted as a war crime under the ICTR.[7] In Prosecutor v. Akayesu, the ICTR found that,

[…] In most cases, the rapes of Tutsi women in Taba, were accompanied with the intent to kill those women. […] In this respect, it appears clearly to the chamber that the acts of rape and sexual violence, as other acts of serious bodily and mental harm committed against the Tutsi, reflected the determination to make Tutsi women suffer and to mutilate them even before killing them, the intent being to destroy the Tutsi group while inflicting acute suffering on its members in the process.[8]

In the case of the Rwandan Genocide, rape was used as both a tool for ethnic cleansing and as a form of torture before killing victims. The Court defined rape as “a physical invasion of a sexual nature committed under circumstances that are coercive.”[9] The ICTR set a legal precedent for the prosecution of and conviction on the charge of rape for the ICTY, which convicted someone of rape in 2001.



[1] “Geneva Conventions,” Council on Foreign Relations, last updated February 2015, http://www.cfr.org/human-rights/geneva-conventions/p8778.
[2]Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977,” Treaties and Documents, International Committee of the Red Cross, last updated August 2014, https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=71FB1C6EEE672887C12563CD0051E768.
[3] Anthony D’Amato, “Nicaragua and International Law: The Academic and The Real,” 79 American Journal of International Law 657, 1985, http://anthonydamato.law.northwestern.edu/Adobefiles/A85d-nicar.pdf.
[4] “Background Information on Sexual Violence used as a Tool of War,” Outreach Programme on the Rwanda Genocide and the United Nations, United Nations Department of Public Information, last updated 2015, http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/rwanda/about/bgsexualviolence.shtml.
[5] “Background Information on Sexual Violence used as a Tool of War,” Outreach Programme on the Rwanda Genocide and the United Nations, United Nations Department of Public Information, last updated 2015, http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/rwanda/about/bgsexualviolence.shtml.
[6] “Rape: weapon of war,” United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/en/newsevents/pages/rapeweaponwar.aspx.
[7] Melissa Jeltsen, “A Look Back at the Trial That Made Rape a War Crime,” The Washington Post, July 29, 2014, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/29/rwanda-genocide-rape_n_5602108.html.
[8] Count 13, Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu (ICTR-96-4-T), International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, September 2, 1998, http://www.unictr.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-96-4/trial-judgements/en/980902.pdf.
[9] Nancy Sai, “Rwanda,” Women Under Siege, Women’s Media Center, February 8, 2012, http://www.womenundersiegeproject.org/conflicts/profile/rwanda.

No comments:

Post a Comment