Political firebrand, Tea Partier, and Junior Senator from
Texas, Ted Cruz, is widely viewed as a potential contender for the Republican
presidential nomination in 2016. However, his birth in Alberta, Canada has
raised issues regarding his eligibility to run for the presidency. In reference
to Section I, Article II of the Constitution:
“No person except a natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any
Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of
thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United
States.”
“Birthers” have, in the past, used this provision to
challenge both sitting presidents and presidential contenders, most recently in
demanding for the release of President Obama’s birth certificate. Prior to
that, in 2008, Republican presidential nominee John McCain faced similar
controversy. Born in the Panama Canal Zone, he faced a number of cases filed
against his campaign, before the Senate unanimously declared him to be a
natural citizen. This, however, does little to resolve the debate.
Short of a constitutional amendment, there is no uniform
interpretation of what a “natural born citizen” is in the context of this
provision. Given this, is Cruz—or any other citizen born on foreign
soil—eligible to run for the presidency?
Most legal experts say yes: to be a
“natural born” citizen, one must either a) be a US citizen at birth, as in being born in the United States, b) be a US citizen
by birth, as in being born to parents
who are citizens, or c) be a US citizen born to parents who meet residency
requirements. As Cruz’s mother was born in Delaware, through condition b, he is
eligible for the presidency insofar as the Supreme Court does not take steps to
clarify the provision.
There has never been, nor will there ever seem to be, any
shortage of non-eligibility claims raised against presidential hopefuls. There
are the examples of Barry Goldwater, who was born in Arizona prior to its
statehood, and George Romney, former Michigan governor and father to Mitt
Romney, who was born to American citizens in Mexico. Both ran largely
unencumbered by their natural birth status.
Cruz will, however, have to deal with the matter of his dual
citizenship. Previously, Governor Romney ran in his election with a dual
Mexican citizenship. As a dual Canadian citizen, Cruz owes allegiance to both
the laws of the United States and Canada. This would, should he win the
presidential election, set a dangerous legal situation, if he as the President
of the United States were to be bound by Canadian law. Of course, the simple
fix would be to revoke his citizenship, as Michelle Bachmann, another possible
presidential contender, did with her Swiss citizenship, as she gained
citizenship in Switzerland through the marriage of her husband.
Bibliography:
Aravosis,
John. "How Ted Cruz Killed the Birther Movement." AMERICAblog News
RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
<http://americablog.com/2013/10/ted-cruz-can-president-can-kenyan-born-obama.html>.
Dobbs,
Michael. "McCain's Birth Abroad Stirs Legal Debate." Washington
Post. The Washington Post, 02 May 2008. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050103224_2.html>.
Graham,
David. "The Atlantic." The Atlantic. Edgecast Networks, n.d.
Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/05/yes-ted-cruz-can-be-born-in-canada-and-still-become-president-of-the-us/275469/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment